LINGUOCULTURAL AND PRAGMATIC FEATURES OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK CHILDREN’S ANECDOTES
Основное содержимое статьи
Аннотация
This article examines English and Uzbek children’s anecdotes as short humorous texts that encode culturally specific models of childhood, schooling, family communication, verbal creativity, politeness and social norms. The study adopts a comparative linguocultural and pragmalinguistic approach. It analyzes selected English and Uzbek children’s jokes in terms of semantic opposition, pragmatic function, cultural code, image system and translation potential. The findings show that English children’s anecdotes tend to rely more heavily on verbal play, idioms, polysemy, homophones, spelling-based ambiguity and the “smart kid” stereotype, whereas Uzbek children’s anecdotes more often foreground family, respect, teacher-student relations, moral upbringing, hospitality, food symbolism, national clothing and everyday cultural realia. In both traditions, children are represented not as passive objects of laughter but as active interpreters of adult discourse. However, the English model emphasizes individual wit and verbal creativity, while the Uzbek model emphasizes polite playfulness and culturally regulated cleverness.
Информация о статье
Раздел
Библиографические ссылки
1. Raskin, V. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht; Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1985. Raskin’s theory explains humor as the result of the collision of two opposite semantic scripts.
2. Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. “Script Theory Revis(it)ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 1991, 4(3–4), 293–348.
3. Chiaro, D. The Language of Jokes: Analysing Verbal Play. London; New York: Routledge, 1992. Chiaro analyzes jokes, riddles, puns, wordplay, listener interpretation and the pragmatics of verbal humor.
4. Kramsch, C. Language and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Kramsch interprets language as a system that expresses, embodies and symbolizes cultural reality.
5. Wierzbicka, A. Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. Wierzbicka argues that certain words and concepts function as key indicators of cultural values.
6. Safarov, Sh. Pragmalingvistika. Toshkent, 2008. Safarov emphasizes the role of communicative intention, social relation and speech situation in linguistic activity.
7. Teliya, V. N. Russkaya frazeologiya: semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvokulturologicheskiy aspekty. Moscow: Shkola “Yazyki russkoy kultury”, 1996. Teliya interprets phraseological units as carriers of figurative thinking and cultural memory.
8. Maslova, V. A. Lingvokulturologiya. Moscow: Akademiya, 2001. Maslova defines linguoculturology as a discipline studying the relationship between language and culture.