LANGUAGE'S NATURAL ORDERS: WHY WE KNOW MORE THAN WE SPEAK
Основное содержимое статьи
Аннотация
When learning a language, most students improve more quickly in receptive skills like reading and listening than in productive abilities like speaking and writing. The primary causes of this imbalance—that one is better than the other—are examined in this essay. In many language proficiency examinations, candidates score higher in reading and listening because they comprehend the material sufficiently; yet, it appears nearly difficult to balance the language skills in speaking and writing. This dynamic leads to a contradiction in language learning: comprehension of language, mostly through reading or listening to real-life conversations, is frequently given precedence over the capacity to articulate ideas and apply them effectively. The purpose of this study is to investigate the significant aspects that contribute to the disparity, such as cognitive processing, input-output load, and the function of instruction in balancing skill development.
Информация о статье
Раздел
Библиографические ссылки
rashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
2. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.
3. Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt039.0
4. Karashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Pergamon Press.
5. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
6. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
7. Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt039.0
8. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–256). Newbury House.