“AI AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN U.S. LAW: AUTHORSHIP, OWNERSHIP, AND THE FAIR USE DEBATE IN MACHINE LEARNING”
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
As generative artificial intelligence (AI) becomes integrated into creative, commercial, and technical workflows, longstanding assumptions in U.S. copyright law face unprecedented pressure. Two questions dominate contemporary debate: (1) Who owns AI-generated outputs and (2) Do AI companies infringe copyright when they train models on publicly available or copyrighted data? Although courts, agencies, and industry actors are racing to establish clarity, the legal landscape remains unsettled. This Article explains current doctrine, analyzes emerging case law, and identifies the likely direction of U.S. IP policy. It concludes with practical guidance for creators, businesses, and policymakers.
Detalles del artículo
Sección
Referencias
1. Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1884).
2. Thaler v. Perlmutter, 1:22-cv-01564 (D.D.C. 2023).
3. U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101–810.
4. U.S. Copyright Office, Copyright Registration Guidance: Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence, Federal Register (2023).
5. U.S. Copyright Office, Human Authorship Requirement, Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices § 306 (3d ed. 2021).
6. American Marketing Association. Generative AI Adoption Survey (2025).
7. S&P Global Market Intelligence. AI Usage Among U.S. Internet Adults (2025).
8. Nationally Representative U.S. Adult Survey on Generative AI Use (2024–2025).
9. Creative Industry Survey on AI Use (2025).
10. Samuelson, Pamela. “Generative AI and Copyright: Emerging Legal Challenges.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law (2024).
11. Cotter, Thomas F. “AI Training Data and Fair Use: Doctrinal Uncertainty and Policy Considerations.” Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper (2025).
12. Reese, R. Anthony. “Authorship in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.” Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts (2024).